XML troubles - Revision history

Diana at 12:18, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:18:45 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 20 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check by viewing the source of the page in your browser. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''.		* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check by viewing the source of the page in your browser. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''.

-	[http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/index.~~html~~ Back to the main GikiCLEF page]	+	[http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/index.php/Main_Page Back to the main GikiCLEF page]

Diana at 12:17, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:17:17 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 20 March 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check by viewing the source of the page in your browser. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''.		* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check by viewing the source of the page in your browser. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''.
		+
		+	[http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/index.html Back to the main GikiCLEF page]

Diana at 12:16, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:16:03 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 20 March 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Augsburg.xml Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Berlin.xml Berlin]		** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Augsburg.xml Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Berlin.xml Berlin]

-	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the ~~View~~ source. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''	+	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check by viewing the source of the page in your browser. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''.

Diana at 12:13, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:13:33 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 20 March 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:		* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:
-	** original format [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.wikipedia Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.wikipedia Berlin]	+	** original format [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Augsburg.wikipedia Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Berlin.wikipedia Berlin]
-	** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.xml Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.xml Berlin]	+	** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Augsburg.xml Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/ExampleTopics/Berlin.xml Berlin]

	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the View source. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''		* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the View source. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''

Diana at 12:07, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:07:31 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 20 March 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Our use of the WikiXML tool made us aware of the following problems		Our use of the WikiXML tool made us aware of the following problems

-	* it was developed with and for the Wikipedia 2006 versions, so the current SQL dumps had to be converted to an older ~~2008~~ format	+	* it was developed with and for the Wikipedia 2006 versions, so the current (2008) SQL dumps had to be converted to an older 2006 format

	* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:		* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:

Diana at 12:06, 20 March 2009

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:06:59 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 20 March 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:		* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:
	** original format [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.wikipedia Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.wikipedia Berlin]		** original format [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.wikipedia Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.wikipedia Berlin]
-	** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.~~xmlAugsburg~~] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.xml Berlin]	+	** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.xml Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.xml Berlin]

-	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the View source. ~~Possible~~ suspect: ~~the XML tag WX:~~	+	* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the View source. Current suspect is a style with ''display:none''

Diana: New page: In this page we provide information on the problems found with the XML version of the GikiCLEF collection, in order to both fully inform GikiCLEF participants and help other possible futur...

Diana — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:50:48 GMT

New page: In this page we provide information on the problems found with the XML version of the GikiCLEF collection, in order to both fully inform GikiCLEF participants and help other possible futur...

New page

In this page we provide information on the problems found with the XML version of the GikiCLEF collection, in order to both fully inform GikiCLEF participants and help other possible future users of it.

Our use of the WikiXML tool made us aware of the following problems

* it was developed with and for the Wikipedia 2006 versions, so the current SQL dumps had to be converted to an older 2008 format

* some of the pages became void during the conversion. Examples are the pages of Augsburg, contrasted with Berlin:
** original format [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.wikipedia Augsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.wikipedia Berlin]
** XML result [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Augsburg.xmlAugsburg] and [http://www.linguateca.pt/GikiCLEF/Berlin.xml Berlin]

* finally, some pages, although apparently correct XML, do not get displayed in the browsers (tested with Firefox and IE), so before complaining that they are void, check the View source. Possible suspect: the XML tag WX: