![[Main Page]](/GikiCLEF/images/logoGikiCLEF.png)
Diana (Talk | contribs)
(New page: How the conflict resolution was done, and first impressions, follow. We could identify four different cases - cases where it is easy to decide who is right (such as type mismatch or info...)
Next diff →
Revision as of 12:27, 18 June 2009
How the conflict resolution was done, and first impressions, follow.
We could identify four different cases
- cases where it is easy to decide who is right (such as type mismatch or information in the page not understood by a non-native speaker, but that leaves no doubt) - cases where we do not know where the values "correct" or "incorrect" come from, and have to check how people did that classification: did they really know, or just expected that the predetermined answers were absolutely correct -- the all and only? If they did, this must be revised :-( - cases where there are genuine disagreements -- and these will be sent to the two or three parties involved, possibly also with copy to the topic owner - cases where different language Wikipedias actually say different things, and so each answer has to be considered individually. This is strictly speaking not a conflict between assessors but between infromation sources, but we have to deal with this with special care.